Do a simple search and answers are found. I guess a few people are already 
making their own:
 
http://www.winnipegfilmgroup.com/handmade_emulsion.aspx
 
http://www.handmadefilm.org/resources/technicalResources/processes/emulsionMaking/silverGelatin/silverGelatinEmulsion.html
 
http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/Emulsion/emulsion.html
 
Maybe this is the future of our craft.
 
Tim
 



Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:04:41 -0700
From: dcinema2...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Forbes editorial about Kodak
To: televis...@hotmail.com
CC: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com



I meant you could always make film.Not sure what would be involved in doing 
that.
Matt
 
http://www.youtube.com/user/oscarthepug1234


http://www.youtube.com/user/matthelme007




From: Tim Halloran <televis...@hotmail.com>
To: dcinema2...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, October 7, 2011 10:03 AM
Subject: RE: [Frameworks] Forbes editorial about Kodak






Interesting little videos, but what do they have to do with "making film?" 
 
When I saw your message I thought I was going to be linked to something about 
actually hand producing film stocks. Does anyone know of anybody who is doing 
this, or has thought of doing it?
 
I guess you meant "you could always make a film. No?
 
Tim
 



Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 11:17:20 -0700
From: dcinema2...@yahoo.com
To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Forbes editorial about Kodak



I guess you could always make film?
Matt
 
http://www.youtube.com/user/oscarthepug1234


http://www.youtube.com/user/matthelme007




From: Pip Chodorov <framewo...@re-voir.com>
To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2011 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Forbes editorial about Kodak

These are my sentiments exactly, and I also use Eudora.
But let's see what happens - maybe film will surprise us and survive.
Let's have this discussion in five years or so when instead of 6-8 
companies making film perhaps there are only 2-3.
-Pip




At 10:18 -0700 6/10/11, Aaron F. Ross wrote:
>It's OK, I always wear a flame-retardant vest while on the Internet.  ;)
>
>BTW, as I said before, I'm not a hater. I just think critically about
>technology. Cases in point: I don't have a smartphone. I still have
>my collection of vinyl records. And I'm still using the same email
>program, Eudora, that I used back in the 1990s during the first round
>of "Flameworks" posts that forced me off the list. And why do I cling
>to these old ways? Not because they're old, not because I resist
>change, but because I have evaluated my needs and decided that these
>older technologies are better for me. New is not necessarily good,
>and old is not necessarily good, either. But in the case of celluloid
>film, very soon it will be a moot point, because you won't be able to
>buy it for love or money. --
>
>Aaron
>

_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks



_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list 
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com 
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

                                          
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Reply via email to