Do a simple search and answers are found. I guess a few people are already making their own: http://www.winnipegfilmgroup.com/handmade_emulsion.aspx http://www.handmadefilm.org/resources/technicalResources/processes/emulsionMaking/silverGelatin/silverGelatinEmulsion.html http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/Emulsion/emulsion.html Maybe this is the future of our craft. Tim
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:04:41 -0700 From: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Forbes editorial about Kodak To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] I meant you could always make film.Not sure what would be involved in doing that. Matt http://www.youtube.com/user/oscarthepug1234 http://www.youtube.com/user/matthelme007 From: Tim Halloran <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, October 7, 2011 10:03 AM Subject: RE: [Frameworks] Forbes editorial about Kodak Interesting little videos, but what do they have to do with "making film?" When I saw your message I thought I was going to be linked to something about actually hand producing film stocks. Does anyone know of anybody who is doing this, or has thought of doing it? I guess you meant "you could always make a film. No? Tim Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 11:17:20 -0700 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Forbes editorial about Kodak I guess you could always make film? Matt http://www.youtube.com/user/oscarthepug1234 http://www.youtube.com/user/matthelme007 From: Pip Chodorov <[email protected]> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2011 10:22 AM Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Forbes editorial about Kodak These are my sentiments exactly, and I also use Eudora. But let's see what happens - maybe film will surprise us and survive. Let's have this discussion in five years or so when instead of 6-8 companies making film perhaps there are only 2-3. -Pip At 10:18 -0700 6/10/11, Aaron F. Ross wrote: >It's OK, I always wear a flame-retardant vest while on the Internet. ;) > >BTW, as I said before, I'm not a hater. I just think critically about >technology. Cases in point: I don't have a smartphone. I still have >my collection of vinyl records. And I'm still using the same email >program, Eudora, that I used back in the 1990s during the first round >of "Flameworks" posts that forced me off the list. And why do I cling >to these old ways? Not because they're old, not because I resist >change, but because I have evaluated my needs and decided that these >older technologies are better for me. New is not necessarily good, >and old is not necessarily good, either. But in the case of celluloid >film, very soon it will be a moot point, because you won't be able to >buy it for love or money. -- > >Aaron > _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
