It's so predictably ironic that the Salon article concludes with a 
link to an illegal, badly transferred, horribly compressed YouTube 
version of Mothlight. That's exactly what makes film purists angry 
about digital, and frankly, I can't blame them.

Aaron



At 10/13/2011, you wrote:
><http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/r_i_p_the_movie_camera_1888_2011/singleton/>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/r_i_p_the_movie_camera_1888_2011/singleton/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On 13/10/2011, at 2:55 AM, Lars Fuchs wrote:
>
>>This isn't good news.
>>
>><http://magazine.creativecow.net/article/film-fading-to-black>http://magazine.creativecow.net/article/film-fading-to-black
>>
>>--
>><http://www.honkthemovie.com/>Honk! If you like funny.
>>
>><mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
>>(347) 469-1964
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>FrameWorks mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing 
>list [email protected] 
>https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

-------------------------------------------

Aaron F. Ross
Digital Arts Guild

_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Reply via email to