Two perf R8 film (2R-1477) is also utilized in my UltraPan8 format to produce a native spherical aspect ratio of 2.8:1, i.e.
http://vimeo.com/27492482 http://vimeo.com/27905787 On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Myron Ort <[email protected]> wrote: > There is double perf 16mm, and Double 8mm which is double perf 16 > with an extra set of sprocket holes such that if split it becomes > Reg. 8mm. > Yes Double 8mm could be shot in a 16mm camera or in a Reg.8 mm camera. > Then it could be spit or not split, yielding several possible > "special effects": > > > 1. shot in Reg. 8 camera, not split= frame quarters seen, one side > upside down unless anticipated in shooting. > 2. shot in 16mm, then split = flicker effect, alternate frame > quadrants. See example below. > 3. shot in 16mm camera, projected one sprocket displaced= half screen > effect, horizontal split, top and bottom of frame. > 4. shot in 16mm camera, double exposed in 8mm camera, then split. Any > number of possible variations or possible multiple exposures with > this kind of thinking. > 5. who knows what you might come up with. > > > Here is a film that was double 8mm film stock shot in a 16mm camera, > meant to be used simply as 16mm, but I accidentally slit it, so > there ended up two rolls (the two halves) of Reg. 8 > with the flicker effect of alternating quadrants, then, after > telecine, I juxtaposed the two halves side by side in "chronological > shooting order" in fcp, yielding this double screen effect with the > rather mysterious > connections between the two halves. Note that one half of the split > double 8mm had to be telecined as A-wind, the other half B-wind in > order for this to properly work out. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch? > v=l4cNZLv5o9M&list=UUhNv2f1M4EKeyTB68E_n5dg&index=8&feature=plcp > > Myron Ort > > > > > > > > On Jan 23, 2012, at 4:03 PM, Steven Gladstone wrote: > >> On 1/23/12 6:21 PM, Myron Ort wrote: >>> double perf versus double 8mm >> >> I always thought you could shoot double 8mm in 16mm, and when it was >> processed you would just have an extra set of unused perfs (might be a >> problem with frame lines if you were off by a perf.) I never tried it, >> so I might be wrong, but I thought the perfs were the same size. >> >> On another note. I have a Redlake Hycam, and would really be happy if >> someone wanted to come take it off my hands. While I'd prefer a >> 501C for >> tax purposes, in the end I'd like it to go to a good home that >> would use it. >> >> I'm located in Brooklyn, N.Y. >> >> >> -- >> Steven Gladstone >> New York Based Cinematographer >> Gladstone films >> Blog - http://indiekicker.reelgrok.com/ >> http://www.blakehousemovie.com >> http://www.gladstonefilms.com >> 917-886-5858 >> _______________________________________________ >> FrameWorks mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >> > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
