I've sent lots of film to Toronto, Seattle and Dwaynes via Canada Post and 
USPS. Air mail and ground shipment. Never had a problem. Also had lots of film 
x-rayed in my carry on in airports, again no problem. I don't mark anything I 
ship with those film x-ray stickers, I think it would just draw more attention, 
but I do include a not inside saying this is exposed film in case customs opens 
it.

If you're really worried send it via ground shipping, no one is going to scan 
ground packages.


John



________________________________
 From: Nicholas Hamlyn <[email protected]>
To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 10:35:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] is sending film through USPS OK?
 

I sent colour neg to Alpha Cine in Seattle from the UK for dev and print and it 
was fine, completely unaffected as far as I can tell,

Nicky.



On 1 Nov 2012, at 17:25, katherine Bauer wrote:

If I send film through the US Postal System will it be x-rayed? is x-raying 
film really that bad for it? Doesn't it depend on the speed of the film. If it 
is a low speed like 100 or 6 (hi-con) will it really affect it!!? 
>thanks 
>xo
>Kitty
>
>
>On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:02 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Send FrameWorks mailing list submissions to
>>        [email protected]
>>
>>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>        https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>        [email protected]
>>
>>You can reach the person managing the list at
>>        [email protected]
>>
>>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>than "Re: Contents of FrameWorks digest..."
>>
>>Today's Topics:
>>
>>   1. Re: Make way for Lucas (hinterland.movies)
>>   2. Re: Make way for Lucas (Adam Hyman)
>>   3. Re: Lighting Gel (Scott Dorsey)
>>   4. Millennium Film Journal (MIllennium Film Journal)
>>
>>
>>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>From: "hinterland.movies" <[email protected]>
>>To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]>
>>Cc: 
>>Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:43:14 -0400
>>Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Make way for Lucas
>>
>>Thanks! Glad to be erong about that
>>
>>Michael
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Michael Betancourt
>>
>>On Oct 31, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Warren Cockerham <[email protected]> 
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>He does put a portion into preservation work. Check the Frameworks archive 
>>for this conversation about a year ago. 
>>>
>>>
>>>Warren
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Oct 31, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Michael Betancourt 
>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>Imagine if he put even a tiny part of his fortune towards preservation 
>>>work...
>>>>
>>>>(but don't hold your breath)
>>>>
>>>>Michael Betancourt
>>>>Savannah, GA USA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>michaelbetancourt.com
>>>>twitter.com/cinegraphic | vimeo.com/cinegraphic
>>>>www.cinegraphic.net | the avant-garde film & video blog
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Chuck Kleinhans 
>>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Announcing his sale of his Lucasfilm studio to Disney Corp and official 
>>>>retirement, George Lucas announced his return to making "experimental 
>>>>films."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>His estimated net worth: US $4.1 billion.  No Kick-starter campaigns for 
>>>>>George.  
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Welcome back George!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Chuck Kleinhans
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>FrameWorks mailing list
>>>>>[email protected]
>>>>>https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>FrameWorks mailing list
>>>>[email protected]
>>>>https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>>FrameWorks mailing list
>>>[email protected]
>>>https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>>
>>
>>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>From: Adam Hyman <[email protected]>
>>To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]>
>>Cc: 
>>Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:54:35 -0700
>>Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Make way for Lucas
>>
>>But next year he’ll be increasing that contribution from $100,000 to 
>>$100,000,000
>>
>>
>>On 10/31/12 10:43 AM, "hinterland.movies" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>Thanks! Glad to be erong about that
>>>
>>>Michael
>>>
>>>
>>>Michael Betancourt
>>>
>>>On Oct 31, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Warren Cockerham <[email protected]> 
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>He does put a portion into preservation work. Check the Frameworks archive 
>>>for this conversation about a year ago. 
>>>>
>>>>Warren
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Oct 31, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Michael Betancourt 
>>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Imagine if he put even a tiny part of his fortune towards preservation 
>>>>work...
>>>>>
>>>>>(but don't hold your breath)
>>>>>
>>>>>Michael Betancourt
>>>>>Savannah, GA USA
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>michaelbetancourt.com <http://michaelbetancourt.com> 
>>>>>twitter.com/cinegraphic <http://twitter.com/cinegraphic>  | 
>>>>>vimeo.com/cinegraphic <http://vimeo.com/cinegraphic> 
>>>>>www.cinegraphic.net <http://www.cinegraphic.net>  | the avant-garde film & 
>>>>>video blog
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Chuck Kleinhans 
>>>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Announcing his sale of his Lucasfilm studio to Disney Corp and official 
>>>>>retirement, George Lucas announced his return to making "experimental 
>>>>>films."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>His estimated net worth: US $4.1 billion.  No Kick-starter campaigns for 
>>>>>>George.  
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Welcome back George!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Chuck Kleinhans
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>FrameWorks mailing list
>>>>>>[email protected]
>>>>>>https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>FrameWorks mailing list
>>>>>[email protected]
>>>>>https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>FrameWorks mailing list
>>>>[email protected]
>>>>https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>>>
>>>>>>________________________________
>>>_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] 
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks 
>>>
>> 
>>
>>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>From: Scott Dorsey <[email protected]>
>>To: [email protected]
>>Cc: 
>>Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:04:45 -0400
>>Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Lighting Gel
>>An 80B filter will take a 3200K lamp and give you about 6000K light,
>>which will mostly match daylight sort of most of the time.
>>
>>It is easier and cheaper to put a filter on the lens rather than gel
>>all the lights, if you don't have any daylight sources in the shot
>>that have to be matched to the lights.
>>
>>It's easier just to use tungsten film most of the time since you don't
>>take the light loss through the filter.
>>--scott
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>From: MIllennium Film Journal <[email protected]>
>>To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]>
>>Cc: 
>>Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:10:24 -0400
>>Subject: [Frameworks] Millennium Film Journal
>>
>>For our subscribers who have been expecting their copy of MFJ 56: 
>>
>>
>>Our offices in Chelsea New York are without electricity and the local post 
>>office is closed. But the journals have arrived and are safe and dry in boxes 
>>in the studio. We expect to get the shipment out next week. 
>>
>>
>>Sorry for the delay! 
>>
>>Grahame Weinbren
>>Senior Editor
>>Millennium Film Journal
>>http://mfj-online.org
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>FrameWorks mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>http://katherineannebauer.blogspot.com 
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
>FrameWorks mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>

_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Reply via email to