I have done a fair amount of bi-packing acetate neg with polyester print stock, and polyester with polyester, and it works fine. Occasionally a frame slips, maybe every 500or 600 feet, but it works well and there's been no damage to the camera that I can detect,
Nicky. -----Original Message----- From: Francisco Torres <[email protected]> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 17:45 Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Bi-packing acetate in a Bolex maybe some one in the US could go to a library and check this out - Bipacking with a Bolex - American Cinematographer, March 1964,p.140 Day,W. Percy 2015-12-03 9:03 GMT-04:00 Chris G <[email protected]>: I've seen pieces that were shot bi-packed in a Bolex using camera stocks. I've shot a fair amount of acetate stock in camera, both single frame and continuous without issue. I guess I'll have to do dummy load tests with acetate-polyester then acetate-acetate. On Dec 3, 2015, at 08:30, Bernd Lützeler <[email protected]> wrote: I have heard of this idea, using the Bolex as a contact printer. Not with these particular stocks. Rather like a rumor... Bernd. Am 03.12.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Dominic Angerame <[email protected]>: I think its a big mistake to attempt. There does not seem to be room for the thickness of the stock and the Bolex has no registration pin to keep frames steady. I would not like to damage my Bolex through bi-paking. Dominic On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Francisco Torres <[email protected]> wrote: try this book- Techniques of Special Effects of Cinematography By Raymond Fielding https://www.google.com.pr/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=isbn:1136055533 the nypl used to have it.... years ago. it cites this article--- '' bipacking with a bolex'', American Cinematographer, March 1964,p.140 Day,W. Percy 2015-12-01 7:44 GMT-04:00 Chris G <[email protected]>: Hi all, I was wondering if it was especially idiotic to bi-pack two acetate-base stocks (in this case both Kodak Hi-Con) in a Bolex for mattes while running it slowly with an animation motor. Thanks! Chris _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
