''He was famously quarrelsome, so an anthology of his correspondence might
be…well, “entertaining”?''


2016-02-22 17:27 GMT-04:00 Chuck Kleinhans <[email protected]>:

> Perhaps the editor/publisher wanted a broader range of essays than Gidal
> alone might have preferred.
>
> But hey, he’s still alive, right?  Why not ask him?
>
> He was famously quarrelsome, so an anthology of his correspondence might
> be…well, “entertaining”?
>
>
> Chuck Kleinhans
>
>
> On Feb 22, 2016, at 9:14 AM, John Muse <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Jonathan.  Right, to his credit, Gidal "curates" in the conflict
> with Snow over "Back and Forth."  Love that.
>
> The Michelson excerpt includes the line that seems to offend him most:
> "Snow has re-defined filmic space as that of action."  Strange that he
> doesn't include the exchange of letters.  Maybe he wanted to but was denied
> rights?
>
> j
>
> On Feb 22, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Jonathan Walley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Interesting question. Keep in mind that Gidal also included and essay on
> Ken Jacobs’ Tom Tom... (by Lois Mendelson and Bill Simon, also from
> Artforum) that he (Gidal) expressly marked as “symptomatic of current
> misunderstanding” and “fetishization of process and idealization of the
> formal in its weak sense.” Vidal attributed the same “blindness” to the
> film itself. So he was open to polemically including “bad” essays.
>
> He doesn’t include a similar note about the Michelson piece, though he
> only includes an excerpt. Perhaps he found that excerpt less “wrongheaded”
> than other passages in the essay. The entire Snow section of Structural
> Film Anthology is on the polemical side, including the rather pissy letter
> from Snow to Gidal in response to the latter’s comments about Back-Forth.
>
> Sort of an answer?
>
> Dr. Jonathan Walley
> Associate Professor and Chair
> Department of Cinema
> Denison University
> [email protected]
>
>
> Chuck Kleinhans
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Reply via email to