On 18 Apr, Scott Haug wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 11:36:14AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On 17 Apr, Scott Haug wrote:
>>
>> The one request that I have at this point is for you to create an rpm
>> that we can bundle/link from the freeamp page. I'm trying our source
>> distro to keep from ballooning in size so I don't want to include your
>> source in the freeamp distro. I will write the code so that if the
>> id3lib is not found it will degrade gracefully and then we will make
>> sure that people know where to find the rpm/source dists that they need
>> for id3v2 support.
>
> I just uploaded rpm's for id3lib 3.7.0. Please test them out and let me know
> if they actually work...
>
> http://download.sourceforge.net/id3lib/id3lib-3.7.0-1.src.rpm
> http://download.sourceforge.net/id3lib/id3lib-3.7.0-1.i386.rpm
> http://download.sourceforge.net/id3lib/id3lib-devel-3.7.0-1.i386.rpm
Awesome -- I'll check them out later today.
Also, as I'm working on implementing your library in FreeAmp I've run
into the problem that the API on windows (due to DLL restrictions,
thanks Bill!) is different that the API on Linux. Since FreeAmp is C++
the linux API feels a lot more natural.
However, since our code runs on both platforms it makes for a really
ugly section of code with each call to your lib being wrapped by some
ifdefs to get the right incantation.
This leads me to wonder if it wouldn't be smarter to use the DLL
wrapper under linux as well. This would give more consistency in the
code and programs that were compiled with a different compiler could
use the lib as well. Right now the mangling is compiler dependent,
right?
--ruaok Freezerburn! All else is only icing. -- Soul Coughing
Robert Kaye -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://moon.eorbit.net/~robert
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.freeamp.org/mailman/listinfo/freeamp-dev
