On 2013/02/28 16:44, Moore, Robert wrote: >> ACPI Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.BAT0._UID] (Node >> 0xfffffe00094a51c0), AE_AML_NO_OPERAND (20110527/uteval-113) > > Sorry, could not reproduce the problem here: > > > - ex _SB_.BAT0._UID > Evaluating \_SB_.BAT0._UID > Evaluation of \_SB_.BAT0._UID returned object 000342A0, external buffer > length 10 > [Integer] = 0000000000000001 > > > > Please send a full list of all such ACPI errors.
/var/log/messages of my last crash is at http://www.filedropper.com/messages Picking the best (I hope): Feb 16 11:33:00 dlat kernel: ACPI APIC Table: <DELL CBX3 > Feb 16 11:33:00 dlat kernel: ACPI Warning: FADT (revision 5) is longer than ACPI 2.0 version, truncating length 268 to 244 (20110527/tbfadt-317) ... Feb 16 11:33:00 dlat kernel: battery0: <ACPI Control Method Battery> on acpi0 Feb 16 11:33:00 dlat kernel: battery1: <ACPI Control Method Battery> on acpi0 Feb 16 11:33:00 dlat kernel: battery2: <ACPI Control Method Battery> on acpi0 Feb 16 12:36:11 dlat kernel: ACPI Error: No object attached to node 0xfffffe00094a51c0 (20110527/exresnte-138) Feb 16 12:36:11 dlat kernel: ACPI Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.BAT0._UID] (Node 0xfffffe00094a51c0), AE_AML_NO_OPERAND (20110527/uteval-113) The last two messages repeated with some variations repeated in thousands. Other than that: Feb 16 12:43:41 dlat kernel: ACPI Error: Object not a Integer, type Buffer (20110527/exresnte-209) ... Feb 16 12:47:51 dlat kernel: ACPI Warning: For \_SB_.BAT0._HID: Return type mismatch - found UNDEFINED, expected Integer/String (20110527/nspredef-1116) ... Feb 16 12:47:51 dlat kernel: ACPI Error: Return object type is incorrect [\_SB_.BAT0._HID] (Node 0xfffffe00094a5200), AE_TYPE (20110527/uteval-176) Feb 16 12:47:51 dlat kernel: ACPI Error: Type returned from _HID was incorrect: UNDEFINED, expected Btypes: 0x3 (20110527/uteval-178) ... (in about tens) and the final word was: Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: ACPI Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.BAT0._UID] (Node 0xfffffe00094a51c0), AE_AML_NO_OPERAND (20110527/uteval-113) Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: ACPI Error: No object attached to node 0xfffffe00094a9400 (20110527/exresnte-138) Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: ACPI Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.BAT1._UID] (Node 0xfffffe00094a9400), AE_AML_NO_OPERAND (20110527/uteval-113) Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: ACPI Warning: Large Reference Count (0x94D) in object 0xfffffe00094d2000 (20110527/utdelete-480) Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: ACPI Error: Return object type is incorrect [\_SB_.BAT0._HID] (Node 0xfffffe00094a5200), AE_TYPE (20110527/uteval-176) Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: ACPI Error: Type returned from _HID was incorrect: UNDEFINED, expected Btypes: 0x3 (20110527/uteval-178) Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: ACPI Error: No object attached to node 0xfffffe00094a51c0 (20110527/exresnte-138) Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: ACPI Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.BAT0._UID] (Node 0xfffffe00094a51c0), AE_AML_NO_OPERAND (20110527/uteval-113) Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: cpuid = 3; apic id = 03 Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: fault virtual address = 0x10116 Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: fault code = supervisor read data, page not present Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff802bc360 Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffff848f6db390 Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffff848f6db3c0 Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: current process = 2199 (conky) Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: trap number = 12 Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: panic: page fault Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: cpuid = 3 Feb 16 12:58:15 dlat kernel: Uptime: 1h21m11s Now I see I overestimated time since the last crash - I'm approaching hardly two weeks. Anyway, no further crash since Feb 16 == the day I'm using hw.acpi.osname="Linux". There may be other factors involved as well: - I update to 9-STABLE 1-2 times a week - I often switch compilers (gcc x clang) to build the system Since the last crash the only "bad" message I get from ACPI is: ACPI Warning: FADT (revision 5) is longer than ACPI 2.0 version, truncating length 268 to 244 (20110527/tbfadt-320) on system startup. BR, Oli _______________________________________________ freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
