On 2013/02/28 17:38, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 28/02/2013 17:44 Moore, Robert said the following: >>> ACPI Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.BAT0._UID] (Node >>> 0xfffffe00094a51c0), AE_AML_NO_OPERAND (20110527/uteval-113) >> >> Sorry, could not reproduce the problem here: >> >> >> - ex _SB_.BAT0._UID >> Evaluating \_SB_.BAT0._UID >> Evaluation of \_SB_.BAT0._UID returned object 000342A0, external buffer >> length 10 >> [Integer] = 0000000000000001 > > To me it is semi-obvious that the reported problem is a consequence of the > FreeBSD > "heisenbug" that I reported before. The one that messes up the internal > state of > ACPICA and which I previously blamed either on ACPICA object cache or ACPICA > reference counting. But now I am inclined to think that it is caused by > something > in FreeBSD adaptation layer. >
Yes, I looked at David Demelier's report - the ACPI errors are nearly identical. I'll enable crash dumps, just in case... BR Oli _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
