In message <> Kevin Day writes:
: i.e. uid 1001 starts 40 processes eating as much cpu as they can. Then uid
: 1002 starts up one process. Uid 1002's process gets 50% cpu, and uid 1001's
: 40 processes get 50% cpu shared between them. 

I've seen some experimental patches in the past that try to do just
this.  However, there are some problems.  What if uid 1002's process
does a sleep.  Should the 40 processes that 1001 just get 50% of the
cpu?  Or should there be other limits.  It turns into an interesting
research problem in a hurry.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to