On Thursday 01 December 2011 03:37 am, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > On 01.12.2011 00:07, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > On Wednesday 30 November 2011 05:32 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 26/11/2011 18:33 Gleb Kurtsou said the following: > >> > Using new vm_page_alloc_contig() may be a better option here. > >> > Can't help with patch, stuck with pre Nov 15 CURRENT myself. > >> > >> on 27/11/2011 19:09 Alan Cox said the following: > >> > vm_page_alloc_contig() should be used instead. > >> > >> My take on the patch: > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/vbox-10.patch > >> This is for head only, no check for FreeBSD version. > > > > Actually, I did the same thing last night: > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/patch-src-VBox-Runtime-r0drv-free > >bsd-memobj-r0drv-freebsd.c > > > > This is a drop-in replacement for the patch. The only practical > > difference I see from yours is I used VM_ALLOC_INTERRUPT instead > > of VM_ALLOC_NORMAL. I believe this function may be used in > > interrupt context. FYI, I tried FreeBSD 9 and Fedora 10 without > > problem. > > Thanks a lot for both patches! Could you please as usual reply and > tell me if it is okay to send this patch upstream under MIT > license?
Yes, as usual. :-) > Once there is some positive feedback I will commit both patches to > the ports tree. Thanks! Jung-uk Kim _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
