On 15 Dec 2011 21:25, "Kevin Oberman" <kob6...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Chris Rees <cr...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 15 December 2011 17:58, O. Hartmann <ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > >> Since ZFS in Linux can only be achieved via FUSE (ad far as I know), it > >> is legitimate to compare ZFS and ext4. It would be much more competetive > >> to compare Linux BTRFS and FreeBSD ZFS. > >> > > > > > > Er... does ext4 guarantee data integrity? > > > > You're not comparing like with like; please do some research on the > > point of ZFS before asserting that they're fair comparisons. > > > > A fair(er) comparison could be ext4 with UFS+soft-updates. > > Wouldn't UFS+SUJ be the closest atch?
Yup. Thanks. Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
