On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:13:18AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: > On 14 May 2015, at 09:59, Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 09:55:19AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: > >> On 14 May 2015, at 01:02, Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> - it is partially CDDL partially BSD license. > >> > >> We currently have a WITHOUT_CDDL knob that some people use. If we don’t > >> build the CDDL parts, what will break? > >> > > Exactly the same thing that breaks right now WITHOUT_GNU and/or WITHOUT_CXX > > aka > > you won't have the main part of the toolchain (aka troff/nroff) > > But man pages will still work via mandoc? WITHOUT_GNU is known not to work > (though we’re trying to address that with 11). WITHOUT_CDDL is generally > expected to give a working system currently.
Yes since I switched the default manpage renderer to mandoc(1) :) (meaning that WITHOUT_GNU is also not blocking manpage rendering) Best regards, Bapt
Description: PGP signature