On 14 May 2015, at 10:24, Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:13:18AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: >> On 14 May 2015, at 09:59, Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 09:55:19AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: >>>> On 14 May 2015, at 01:02, Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> - it is partially CDDL partially BSD license. >>>> >>>> We currently have a WITHOUT_CDDL knob that some people use. If we don’t >>>> build the CDDL parts, what will break? >>>> >>> Exactly the same thing that breaks right now WITHOUT_GNU and/or WITHOUT_CXX >>> aka >>> you won't have the main part of the toolchain (aka troff/nroff) >> >> But man pages will still work via mandoc? WITHOUT_GNU is known not to work >> (though we’re trying to address that with 11). WITHOUT_CDDL is generally >> expected to give a working system currently. > > Yes since I switched the default manpage renderer to mandoc(1) :) (meaning > that > WITHOUT_GNU is also not blocking manpage rendering)
Sounds good to me. Probably warrants a release notes entry specifically documenting that change, but otherwise sounds like a big improvement! David _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"