On 7/8/15, O'Connor, Daniel <dar...@dons.net.au> wrote:
>
>> On 8 Jul 2015, at 08:11, Garrett Wollman <woll...@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>
>> wrote:
>> Perhaps the test was (erroneously) written to assume that
>> gettimeofday() was a system call, and could therefore detect invalid
>> pointers and return [EFAULT].  This has not been the case for some
>> time.  (In HEAD, not since r237434, which is three years ago.)
>
> In defence of the test, the man page says it can return EFAULT.

That's fine, but why changed the behaviour since 2015. May 27.? I have
an older FreeBSD/HardenedBSD install, where this test passing. See
some previous email in this thread.

>
> (IMO the man page and test should change..)
>
> --
> Daniel O'Connor
> "The nice thing about standards is that there
> are so many of them to choose from."
>  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
>
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to