Is this with or without Benno's patch?

On July 31, 2015 12:24:11 PM Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> wrote:

Try the following patch. There’s a fundamental misunderstanding of newbus that’s screwing things up…

Also available at http://people.freebsd.org/~imp/patch-queue/pms

The problem is that the first time through for ahd0 we’re setting cardMap[0] to 5. The second time through it is already 5, so we say ‘oh, this has been probed before’ and return 2. This causes antiapi_probe() to return 0, because the card has already been probed before. This is wrong on so many levels, but I’ll suppress channelling my inner bde and stop here.

Warner

diff -r 1805eb187340 sys/dev/pms/freebsd/driver/common/lxutil.c
--- a/sys/dev/pms/freebsd/driver/common/lxutil.c
+++ b/sys/dev/pms/freebsd/driver/common/lxutil.c
@@ -757,18 +757,25 @@ STATIC int agtiapi_ProbeCard( device_t d
 {
   int idx;
   static U32 cardMap[4] = { 0, 0, 0, 0 };
+  u_int16_t agtiapi_vendor; // PCI vendor ID
   u_int16_t agtiapi_dev; // PCI device ID
   AGTIAPI_PRINTK("agtiapi_ProbeCard: start\n");

+#if 0
   if ( ! atomic_cmpset_32( &cardMap[thisCard], 0, 5 ) ) { // card already ran
     AGTIAPI_PRINTK( "We'll only ID this card once -- %d\n", thisCard );
     return 2; // error return value; card already ran this function
   }
   else {
+#else
+  {
+#endif
+    agtiapi_vendor = pci_get_vendor( dev ); // get PCI vendor ID
     agtiapi_dev = pci_get_device( dev ); // get PCI device ID
     for( idx = 0; idx < COUNT(ag_card_type); idx++ )
     {
-      if( ag_card_type[idx].deviceId == agtiapi_dev )
+      if( ag_card_type[idx].deviceId == agtiapi_dev &&
+         ag_card_type[idx].vendorId == agtiapi_vendor)
       { // device ID match
         memset( (void *)&agCardInfoList[ thisCard ], 0,
                 sizeof(ag_card_info_t) );



> On Jul 31, 2015, at 8:41 AM, Larry Rosenman <l...@lerctr.org> wrote:
>
> Please do pull it from GENERIC until this is fixed in HEAD  and RELENG/10.
>
>
> On July 31, 2015 8:32:17 AM Glen Barber <g...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 05:27:22AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> > Ok, I made a GENERIC-NOPMS, without the device pmspcv, and adjusted my custom >> > to include GENERIC-NOPMS. And we boot (I'm typing this from a ssh session
>> > to the box).
>> >
>>
>> Larry, thank you very much for testing this.
>>
>> Benno, for 10.2-RELEASE, I think we're going to pull pmspcv from GENERIC
>> and issue an EN for the driver update when this is fixed.
>>
>> I think this should be pulled from GENERIC in head and stable/10 in the
>> meantime, as well.
>>
>> Glen
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"



_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to