On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:18:31PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Slawa Olhovchenkov <s...@zxy.spb.ru> writes:
> > Can you explain what is problem?
> Radical suggestion: read the first email in the thread.
I am read and don't understund (you talk about trouble of maintaining
the HPN patches).
I see patched version in ports. This version maintaining.
What is problem? Differnt openssh? Quality of patches?
ports branch is worse (by some reaason) base branch?
> > PS: As I today know, kerberos heimdal is practicaly dead as opensource
> > project. Have FreeBSD planed switch to MIT Kerberos? I am know about
> > security/krb5.
> We switched from MIT to Heimdal at some point in the past for some
> reason I don't remember. MIT and Heimdal are *not* interchangeable at
I think because MIT stop development in the past.
> the source or binary level, so switching back is not trivial.
I am know about this.
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"