On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:15:35PM -0500, Allan Jude wrote:

> On 2015-11-11 19:06, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:32:27PM -0800, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> > 
> >> On 11/10/2015 1:42 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> >>>  I would also like to remove the NONE cipher
> >>> patch, which is also available in the port (off by default, just like in
> >>> base).
> >>
> >> Fun fact, it's been broken in the port for several months with no
> >> complaints. It was just reported and fixed upstream in the last day and
> >> I wrote in a similar fix in the port. That speaks a lot about its usage
> >> in the port currently.
> > 
> > I am try using NPH/NONE with base ssh and confused: don't see
> > performance rise, too complex to enable and too complex for use.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> > 
> 
> I did a few quick (and dirty) benchmarks and it shows that the NONE
> cipher definitely makes a difference. Version of OpenSSL also seems to
> make a difference, as one might expect.
> 
> Note: openssh from ports seems to link against both base and ports
> libcrypto, I am still trying to make sure this isn't corrupting my
> benchmark results.
> 
> I am still debugging my dummynet setup to be able to prove that HPN
> makes a difference (but it does).
> 
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/SSHPerf

I see you test NONE only on OpenSSH_7.1p1/1.0.2d.
I am try OpenSSH_6.6.1p1./1.0.1p (both side)
I am got about 500Mbit/s.
For OpenSSH_6.6.1p1/NONE I am got abot same.

I am don't see this combination in you table (OpenSSH_6.6.1p1./1.0.1p ix0 
OpenSSH_6.6.1p1./1.0.1p)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to