David O'Brien wrote:
>
> They should be stated because they need to be moved
> linux - Linux binary compat
> Also buses
> isa - there is some MI stuff in here
Good point. For the linuxulator this has been discussed before and
something in the line off...
sys/$MACHINE/compat/linux // MD part
sys/$MACHINE/compat/others
sys/compat/linux // MI part
sys/compat/others
...came out of it. This also matches where the Linuxulator has its
sysctl variables (= compat.linux.*) and where other emulators are
expected to have their variables.
--
Marcel Moolenaar
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel: (408) 447-4222
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: /sys hierarchy David O'Brien
- Re: /sys hierarchy Warner Losh
- Re: /sys hierarchy Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: /sys hierarchy Doug Barton
- Re: /sys hierarchy Bruce Evans
- Re: /sys hierarchy Wilko Bulte
- Re: /sys hierarchy David O'Brien
- Re: /sys hierarchy Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: /sys hierarchy Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: /sys hierarchy David O'Brien
- Re: /sys hierarchy Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: /sys hierarchy David O'Brien
- Re: /sys hierarchy Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: /sys hierarchy David O'Brien
- Re: /sys hierarchy David O'Brien
- Re: /sys hierarchy John Baldwin
- Re: /sys hierarchy John Baldwin
- Re: /sys hierarchy Alfred Perlstein
- Re: /sys hierarchy Kenjiro Cho
- Re: /sys hierarchy John Baldwin
- Re: /sys hierarchy Robert Watson
