Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2000 14:56:35 +0100, Ben Smithurst wrote:
>> 'pseudo-device stf' gives an error, stf lives in the gif driver, so this
>> is required really. Is that ok? Is there anyone at KAME I should send
>> this to as well?
> I'm interested to see how the KAME folks react to our chucking out the
> pseudo-device keyword from config(8). :-)
Ah, good point... I did my test on -stable where pseudo-device still
exists. I'll wait for a while for this one then. There's another PR
open on this problem, which asmodai is looking at (18852).
Ben Smithurst / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / PGP: 0x99392F7D