Sorry to chime in so late, but ppp(8) already has ATM support...  I 
must confess that I haven't tested it and don't know how it works, 
but it may be worth looking at.  A netgraph node would definitely be 

> On Sun, 22 Oct 2000 03:41:27 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >>>>Who knows about the ATM stuff in the kernel?
> >>>
> >>>We have two ATM stacks:
> >>>   * The minimalist "chuck" stack.
> >>>   * The full-blown HARP stack.
> >>>
> >>>Neither support netgraph.
> >>
> >>Are you aware of any efforts to add PPP over ATM or Netgraph 
> >>support to the current ATM code?
> >
> >I'm not aware of any activity in the ATM code at all...
> Ok, well if I were to netgraphify the ATM code, would mpd be sufficient
> to get PPP over ATM working?  (I have a lot of reading up to do, but
> if I can decide on the correct direction to start off in I could save myself
> alot of time ;)).  And for the record I have done ethernet drivers in Linux
> and OS/2.   But I am quite unfamiliar with the FreeBSD networking code.
> I have only submitted patches to the kernel for cyrix code optimizations. :)
> I looked into netgraph and it seems to be a very modular and a wise
> approach to take if it sufficient for this purpose.
> Brian Smith

Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                        <brian@[uk.]>
      <>                   <brian@[uk.]>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to