> Rant second: FreeBSD *violates* years of traditions with it's
> treatment of /usr/local. /usr/local is for *local* things, not add-on
> software packages! Coopting /usr/local for non-local software creates
> needless complexity and confusion, which of course leads to needless
> pain.

Agreed. It would be nice if FreeBSD could use the same system as NetBSD,
storing the packages/ports under /usr/pkg.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to