In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Dillon writes:
>:
>:Why not this:
>:
>:s = splbio();
>:TAILQ_FOREACH(bp, &vp->v_dirtyblkhd, b_vnbufs) {
>
> First rule when making simple bug fixes by copying working code from one
> source file to another is: Dont try to optimize the code on the
> fly.
>
> Personally speaking, I don't find the FOREACH macros any more readable
> vs an explicit for loop. They hide too much... like for example the
> fact that you are dependant on the current pointer remaining valid to
> get the next pointer in the loop.
Is that any different from
for (i = 0; i < N; i++) {
bla;
}
?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message