On 23-Apr-01 Ian Dowse wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh
> writes:
>>:
>>: Yes, but until such time as we do that we should warn people in UPDATING at
>>: least.
>>:
>>
>>OK, but you won't like the UPDATING entry.
>
> The bug actually looks fairly simple to fix. ffs_reload() isn't
> checking if the new superblock fields are zero, so if an old fsck
> zeros them out between a read-oly mount and a read-write remount,
> then we get a division by zero or something later.
Fair enough, I guess ffs_reload() should just sanity check the values. Any
takers?
> Ian
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
