On Fri, 04 May 2001 20:38:06 +0900, Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote:

> All of examples are just "we want yet another *generic* kernel for
> specific machines".
> Why you don't replace src/sys/${arch}/conf/GENERIC file to your own
> (customized) version? It is too simple, and matches your requirements.

Because that's a repo-backed file.  Why make me manage CVS conflicts on
update?  Why not just allow something like RELEASE_KERNCONF?  What's the
real objection to it?  So far, all I've heard is "Gee, I've never needed
that". :-)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to