I have the PR, and I will fix this :-)


> On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > The reason for this is that the pam code for doing the enforcement
> > is being trusted utterly.  In the past, we would consider both
> > the primary group (the group from the passwd file entry), and the
> > auxillary groups (the groups from the groups file entries, if any),
> > as synonymous.  With the pam code being used, we no longer consider
> > the primary group to be on the same par as the groups file entries.
> I can pin this down at r1.26 of su.c
> (Mon May 25 03:34:52 1998 UTC (3 years, 2 months ago) by steve)
> Prior to this date only appearance in /etc/group was considered.
> The change occurred in response to PR bin/6696
> Like terry, I prefer the semantics whereby the users primary
> group is considered. Three years of precedent should be sufficient
> to have this change to pam_wheel.c, I hope, before PAM use in su
> is MFC'd.
> I have just entered a PR on this.
> cc'd to: markm
> Joshua
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to