The plathome developing the driver is used the same chipset. So, the latest driver support TSB43AA22. Since the exact chipset name I had not known, the kernel will probe the chipset as "TSBXXXXXX".
Thanks for offerring the information. I believe the name iLink is not popular in outside of Japan. I prefer the name as firewire. Toshihiko ARAI wrote: > + Katsushi Kobayashi wrote: > > > Anyway, I can add the new chipset to the liist of supporting chipset, > > if we get volunteer. > > I have small data, device of vendor=0x104c, dev=0x8021 seems to be > "TSB43AA22 Integrated 1394a-2000 OHCI PHY/Link Layer Controller". > http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/productfolder.jhtml?genericPartNumber=TSB43AA22 > > It is used with the following machine at least: > > VAIO PCG-R505/ABW > /kernel: pci1: <unknown card> (vendor=0x104c, dev=0x8021) at 0.0 irq 3 > > VAIO PCG-C1VS > none2@pci0:8:0: class=0x0c0010 card=0x80b2104d chip=0x8021104c rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > > Because both added it to probe routine of fwohci, the device was > recognized. As for PCG-C1VS, DVTS seems to have worked. However, > both is firewire driver of 4.x base. > > By the way, alias of firewire was i.LINK and IEEE1394, but the FreeBSD > people selected it as firewire? > > -- > Toshihiko ARAI > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
