On 12-Sep-01 Julian Elischer wrote:
> My comment is that if this is a locking change than it should be part of
> the locking changes..
> so it's just each of us 'batting' to put the patch in the other
> set..
You could have done 'suser(td->td_proc)' but instead you have changed an API
that now has to be unchanged. :( Hence we have people asking about whether or
not to document the suser_td() function. This would not have required the 'p'
variable and would have preserved the API, which is perfectly acceptable in
this case seeing as how ucred's are per-proc and not per-thread, thus suser()
still is a proc related check, not a thread related one as suser_td() seems to
imply. No bother, it will all be backed out eventually anyways. :-/
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
