On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, John Baldwin wrote:

> On 08-Nov-01 Bruce Evans wrote:
> > The i386 <machine/atomic.h> still uses archaic constraints for some
> > input-output operands ("0" for the first operand).  These never worked
> > right and if fact don't actually work for compiling this file without
> > optimization.
> Hmm, would you prefer this diff then, I've had it floating around for a while
> now but wasn't sure it was right:

Yes, it is right provided all the operand renumbering is right.  I suppose
it can't be checked simply by comparing all objects, because it sometimes
changes the register allocation?

There are a couple more "0"s in atomic_cmpset_int(), and many more in other
files (even in cpufunc.h).


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to