Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Nope, what David was _actually_ trying to say is to hold off with WARNS
> fixes until GCC 3.1 becomes our compiler, because otherwise this is an
> almost 100% duplicate of efforts, as GCC 3.1 is so WARNS-different from
> GCC 2.95.3.  And of course David should add NO_WERROR (but probably to
> Makefile.inc1) to avoid world breakage.

A cynic would say that that means that there are two sets
of things that need to be fixed, and not just one.

Another cynic might say "instead of speculating, why not
ask David what David was trying to say?"... I know: no
patience on these lists.  8-).

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to