On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:12:38AM +0000, Mark Murray wrote:
> IMO, this is a good reason to not have WARNS contain -Werror at this
> time. NO_WERROR is a good way to fix this (again IMO). I see a great
> need to let warnings "hang out", and in an ideal world I see an need
> for (new) warnings to break things. I see no need for warnings to
> hold back a project as important as GCC3, and NO_WERROR is the
> cleanest solution.
> I do not expect others to agree with (or like) this.

I do not.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to