On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:35:41AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 07:29:57PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > - is GCC3 also better on Alpha as far as correctness of the generated
> > code goes? Or is that what you mean by "bad optimised code" ?
> We shall see.
> > - The gcc 2.95 compiler is quite a bit slower (it appears) on Alpha than
> > on x86. Do you have any idea how gcc3 does in this respect?
> 3.1 will also be slower on the Alpha. It is really an issue of the code
> generator. Generating x86 code on an Alpha is faster than generating
> [native] Alpha code. The Alpha code generator is slow. It may be that
> all 64 bit or RISC GCC code generation is slow -- we will see soon for
> the sparc64.
Thanks. So it is the code generator itself, I always thought it would be
the optimiser that needs more time to do a decent job on a RISC.
| / o / /_ _ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message