On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:12:48PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > I'm working on porting the latest beta release of Subversion, which > does all that and more, and has much better diff support than > Perforce. After using Perforce for my PAM work, I've come to the > conclusion that although it's a big step forward from CVS in one > direction (change management & branching), it's a big step backward in > almost every other direction.
I can't comment on Perforce, but I can add that I liked subversion even when it wasn't self hosting; it appears promising to say the least. As for your port, there already is a /usr/ports/devel/subversion; it points you to the port skeleton for version r909. Is yours better/different? --Stijn -- "I'm not under the alkafluence of inkahol that some thinkle peep I am. It's just the drunker I sit here the longer I get."
Description: PGP signature