On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:18:33PM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:12:48PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > I'm working on porting the latest beta release of Subversion, which
> > does all that and more, and has much better diff support than
> > Perforce.  After using Perforce for my PAM work, I've come to the
> > conclusion that although it's a big step forward from CVS in one
> > direction (change management & branching), it's a big step backward in
> > almost every other direction.
> I can't comment on Perforce, but I can add that I liked subversion even
> when it wasn't self hosting; it appears promising to say the least.
> As for your port, there already is a /usr/ports/devel/subversion; it points
> you to the port skeleton for version r909. Is yours better/different?

i imagine his is more up to date ;-)

909 is a ways back, we're currently up to like rev 1310 or something.
the next milestone will be rolled this week, and i'll update the port
once it's out.


garrett rooney                     Unix was not designed to stop you from 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]       doing stupid things, because that would  
http://electricjellyfish.net/      stop you from doing clever things.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to