On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:46:45PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:30:43PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > *shrug* so we need a port of a devel version of apr. It's what the > > > scientific community calls an "engineering problem" :) > > at the moment, the primary thing holding me back is the fact that > > the apr people, while they do distribute tarballs of the devel version > > of apr, they don't keep them around, so there wasn't a tarball to > > point the port to that would be good for more than 5 days. that, > > combined with the fact that subversion tends to track apr really > > closely, so we would end up needing to update the port a lot, has kept > > me from putting too much time into an apr port. > > The first problem is solveable by storing tarballs on freefall and > using that as MASTER_SITE. The second (assuming the changes are > mostly to the code and not to the build infrastructure) is a non- > problem; if you keep me informed whenever a new tarball is out, I'll > keep the port up-to-date.
cool, i'll put together an apr port and have the next version of my subversion port use that. > Do you have a port skeleton for apr? not at the moment. i'll put one together tonight, assuming nobody else beats me to it. -garrett -- garrett rooney Unix was not designed to stop you from [EMAIL PROTECTED] doing stupid things, because that would http://electricjellyfish.net/ stop you from doing clever things. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message