On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 06:36:05PM +0100, Jan Stocker wrote: > 2) Bug is in os delivered gcc but not in port gcc. > a) port has more or less patches / os gcc has been modified > --> Didn't someone told they are the same?
Port has less patches. If you look at /usr/src/contrib/gcc/contrib/freebsd.h and /usr/src/contrib/gcc/contrib/i386/freebsd.h you will see how much things have to be modified because we support dual ELF/a.out [still]. > b) other options were set at compile time > --> Why dont change to the same in the port? I am willing to -- the gcc295 port isn't used very much now AFAIK. However, it will probably be once 5-CURRENT moves to a newer version. The FSF GCC people had settings in the i386/freebsd.h file I did not agree with, but it would have been too much pain to change them in the FSF 2.95 release branch. I am willing (and may have to anyway), make the port more agree with the FreeBSD system compiler. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
