On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 01:20:51PM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> >    b) other options were set at compile time
> >       --> Why dont change to the same in the port?
> >           Leads it to a broken world?
> >           If the only difference is the lost of binary compatibility,
> >           i would say, ok... do it now and we'll need to compile
> >           or ports...
> Pretty much each and every C++ binary and shared library will have to be
> recompiled. Massive binary compatibility breakage is not an option for
> -STABLE, one can hope.

No it is not an option for -STABLE.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to