On 04-Sep-2002 Richard Tobin wrote:
>> You are blowing this out of proportion and not actually reading
>> what people are proposing. So far, the comments are about
>> removing a.out support from the base compiler and offering
>> a.out binutils and gcc _as ports_.
> That would be sufficient for my needs (a matching gdb would be useful
> too, I'm not sure if that is part of binutils).
> But I don't think my concern was misplaced: having gone back through
> the thread for the past couple of weeks, there were certainly phrases
> "drop all traces of a.out support"
> "if you need to generate new ones (?) unpack a 2.2.6 system"
> with the ports solution mentioned only "if we really have to have a.out".
Well, I think what happened is that people wanted to know if others still
needed a.out and thus if ports should be created. I guess some people
have been saying some more drastic things then that and it is hard to know
who to listen to. :-/ It is a good thing to point out user's needs but
accusing developers of never taking the long-term view (which you did not
do, I know) is not a good way to win others over to one's argument.
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message