On Sun, Feb 09, 2003, David Schultz wrote: > > Yet squid under i386 freebsd is .. well, finds -O bugs in gcc. > > We gave up trying -O under FreeBSD a long time ago. :-) > > The last time someone told me, ``gcc -O is broken'', it turned out > that they were doing some stack fiddling, and gcc's optimizations > broke their faulty assumptions. On the other hand, I'm sure gcc -O > does have bugs. Do you have an example snippet that gets miscompiled?
Err, grab the squid24 port, hack the configure script to remove the bit where it removes -O for FreeBSD, compile, install, run. It should die quite quickly after you submit a HTTP request which requires a DNS lookup - GCC generates an xor %eax, %eax at the beginning of a function which NULLs a pointer - that we're not NULLing. :-) Adrian -- Adrian Chadd <angryskul> learning is bad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <angryskul> it just makes the people around you dumber (angryskul == alfred@irc) <angryskul> :( To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
