On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 12:17:03PM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> Seems to me that were I to do this, and I would, it would only be as viable
> as the patches themselves. That is, I (and any contributors) would have to
> be able to stay abreast of those things going on in -STABLE that could get
> backported to previous releases ("could" being a significant word here).Well, yeah. That's pretty much a pre-requisite. Doesn't mean that you need 100% coverage though. If you produce something that only gets in 80% of the patches that could be applied back that's still better than what we have now. And it makes it easier for someone else to help out with the missing 20%. > So far, I've made three patchfiles that can be applied to 4.2REL and 4.3REL. > Not exactly the repertoire one would need to garner interest and momentum. It's a start. What's the URL? N -- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.freebsd.org/ FreeBSD Documentation Project http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/ --- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F 94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 ---
msg29898/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
