On Dec 10, at 08:00 AM, Nik Clayton wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 12:17:03PM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> > Seems to me that were I to do this, and I would, it would only be as viable
> > as the patches themselves. That is, I (and any contributors) would have to
> > be able to stay abreast of those things going on in -STABLE that could get
> > backported to previous releases ("could" being a significant word here).
>
> Well, yeah. That's pretty much a pre-requisite.
>
> Doesn't mean that you need 100% coverage though. If you produce
> something that only gets in 80% of the patches that could be applied
> back that's still better than what we have now. And it makes it easier
> for someone else to help out with the missing 20%.
Huh? You completely list me with this. Are you trying to say that some
feature of a patch that applies to just the last three of four prior
releases is OK, 'cuz right now none are (except for security fixes to
RELENG_(current - 1))?
> > So far, I've made three patchfiles that can be applied to 4.2REL and 4.3REL.
> > Not exactly the repertoire one would need to garner interest and momentum.
>
> It's a start. What's the URL?
You're kidding, right? I only started thinking about doing this yesterday!
The patches are sitting right here, in $(HOME)/projects.
> N
> --
> FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.freebsd.org/
> FreeBSD Documentation Project http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/
>
> --- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F 94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 ---
Dave
--
______________________ ______________________
\__________________ \ D. J. HAWKEY JR. / __________________/
\________________/\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\________________/
http://www.visi.com/~hawkeyd/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
