Paul Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If 5.3, when it arrives, is genuinely production ready, trust me, the > drinks are on me - I will do my absolute best to get to the next > BSDcon and get everybody drunk on an expense account. If it isn't, > well, I'll just have to whisper "I told you so" quietly somewhere.
I am currently working for an ISP whose infrastructure is based 75% on FreeBSD 5.1. The remaining 25% are a nameserver running 4.7, a mail server and a backup server running 5.2, and a BGP router running a month-old -CURRENT. I am about to start in a new job at a company that builds a high- performance network security appliance based on FreeBSD. The version they travel around with to show off to potential customers runs on -STABLE; the development version runs on -CURRENT. I asked them what it was like to develop on -CURRENT compared to -STABLE. Their answer: "a relief". Now tell me again why you think FreeBSD 5 is a disaster, and why you think we're out of touch with our users and admins. DES -- Dag-Erling Sm�rgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
