Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2007, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith p?e v ?t 22. 05. 2007 v 16:56 -0500:
I have generated two INDEXes, one with the patch and one without.
They
are identical, the timings:
INDEX-orig
real 16m32.761s
user 18m36.802s
sys 8m38.610s
INDEX-ddd
real 16m34.620s
user 17m25.976s
sys 8m46.333s
Sorry it didn't work out. Thanks for trying it.
Don't get me wrong - the minute saved here is good enough reason to
apply that patch.
Could you try the "shell" one also? I got the impression it was a bit
faster.
Can you send me the patch?
Yes. In the same place as the previous one you put:
.ifdef _USE_GNOME
_USE_GNOME!=(for i in ${_USE_GNOME}; do ${ECHO_CMD} $$i; done) | sort -u
.endif
I'm going to try it out myself also to see if it is faster.
I tried it out. On my rather fast computer, I am getting similar times.
The non-shell patch seems slightly better, but there is not much
between that and the shell patch. Both patches give something like 7%
speed improvements over the original. It only potentially speeds up
gnome ports, and then only a few of them like alacarte, so even if it
dramatically speeds those few up, the average speed up over all ports
will not be so great. Like I said earlier, overall improvement is
noticeable albeit not dramatic.
Stephen
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
