Kurt Abahar wrote:
> I have tried the portupgrade way, but unfortunately
> the packages lag behind ports the majority of the
> time.
It's actually 100% of the time, and always will be.
> This led me to think that keeping the ports tree
> a little behind HEAD would be a better solution.
> However, I don't know how to get a hold of this "lag
> time." Is it a few days, a few weeks or ... ?
Maybe you can describe in more detail what you're trying to
accomplish. Leave out potential solutions, just describe what your
goal is.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
