On 02/14/12 08:40, b. f. wrote:
On 12.02.2012 22:43, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 02/12/2012 03:33 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/02/2012 23:22 Stephen Montgomery-Smith said the following:
On 02/12/2012 03:15 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Today I became another user of redports.org. I can definitely
recommend it.
Yes, but it is not without its problems. I tried testing math/sage
on
redports.org. It reported an error building the dependency
math/atlas, which
built fine on mine and other people's systems.
But still this is an instance of environment where the port can
fail, so it
warrants an investigation and fixing. Either in the port or in the
redports
infrastructure.
Yes, you are correct. In fact, in the case of math/atlas there is
the following report. It looks like people are working on it.
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=math&portname=atlas&wildcard=
I think this isn't directly related. The build on redports had status
"dud" in
math/atlas which means the port has set IGNORE. I have no good way of
telling which
IGNORE line it is yet but it can only be one of:
You have set WITH_ARCHDEF, but have not defined ARCHDEF
You must select at least one of WITH_SHARED and WITH_STATIC
both sound strange.
There is nothing strange about them: they just indicate errors arising
from invalid choices of OPTIONS. The build is more likely to be
broken by MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD, which uses IGNORE.
That would explain the problems I am having. I'll quit trying to test
sage on redports.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
