Does anyone have experience with the differences between conary and
Its my understanding the rpath folks have rethought package
management at a very high level and have something more to offer than
gentoo's portage (which some feel is the closest thing in usability
to FreeBSD's ports).
Does anyone have a hands-on perspective of this? I don't mean that
"ports already has 16,000+ ready to go ports and conary has much
fewer". Nor am I looking for the usual FreeBSD vs Linux
perspective. I'm looking for a tech and architecture perspective of
just conary vs ports.
thanks, ke han
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"