On 10/25/2006 14:13, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Wednesday, October 25, 2006 13:58:27 -0500 Eric Schuele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Viewed from a slightly different angle...

If you are responsible for maintaining machine xyz, and you have used
tcpwrappers... chances are you'll eventually need access to that machine
from a location you did not previously expect.  Maybe your sitting in the
airport and get a call that the machine is malfunctioning.  Maybe you are
on call at a social gathering.  In any case, you'll need access and if it
is using tcpwrappers, you may not gain access.

This is *definitely* something that you need to think through. I have two machines at work that are always on, so I can always ssh to them first, then to the server and edit the /etc/hosts.allow file to give myself temporary access, if needed. In general, I prefer to go through those hosts, rather than open another avenue that I may later forget to remove. Since everything I do on those servers (almost) is through ssh, it's not a problem for me to need an extra "hop" before I get to the box.

I'm confused. I was agreeing with you. I was simply adding another reason as to why the author of the "Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea" comment might have made the comment.

Are you saying that my comment above is incorrect? Or that there is a suitable workaround for the problem in my example scenario?

I also agree that using a jump box to gain access to the machine in question would work.

I think I've somehow missed your point.  Please explain.

Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas

freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to