Mel wrote:
On Friday 31 August 2007 19:50:19 Howard Goldstein wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Howard Goldstein wrote:
As the subject says, is there a straightforward way to retrieve a
directory tree from perforce.freebsd.org? Clicking individual files in
the web interface is really tedious.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
It seems the required software for accessing perforce repositories is
available in ports:
/usr/ports/devel/perforce
I haven't tried it myself though. I don't even know if
perforce.freebsd.org allows anonymous access. You can however read some
details on it here:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/p4-primer/index.html
If you do try, it please send a follow up post with results.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
No, it doesn't allow anonymous access (this isn't feasible due to the
way perforce works, i.e. maintaining all client state on the server).
I dont know of a way to extract a general perforce tree, although a
few of them (like trustedbsd) are exported via cvsup on I think
cvsup9. I think you will have to ask whoever's branch you are looking
at for a copy of it.
Dang. Like an idiot savant, perforce appears to be (channeling Yoda I
am?) Time for a script to workaround perforce's needlessly overcomplex
stupidity. Thanks for letting me know I'm beating my head against the
wall with the out-of-box tools...binary only at that.
I assume that since sources in perforce is work-in-progress that may or not
become official work-in-progress (-current), download complexity is a plus.
perforce just isn't intended for this purpose, it's meant for internal
use within a (closed) organisation. As great as it is for development
with large numbers of branches, this is one of the important technical
reasons why it's not suitable for primary FreeBSD distribution.
In principle the web front end could offer this kind of aggregation of
files from a branch, maybe you should raise it as a feature request with
perforce.com.
Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
