On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 08:31:41PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> > >the thing with windoze is that you don't have a choice - in fact, until > >recently you couldn't even have multiple desktops. > > it's OK. users that REQUIRE lots of graphics etc.. don't usually make use > of it. so what's wrong with windoze. right software for the right people. > > >with *nix and the creativity inspired by open source there are many, > >many opportunities. > > in unix - as you say - you have a choice in every place. so that's good > that "desktop usage" isn't "improved" in FreeBSD as this improvement == > lack of choice. > > for those who don't like to "hack the system", just have everything just > put up and ready to use, there is already windows!
. . . but you'd still get a "cooler" desktop by going with something else, like MacOS X, Ubuntu, or PC-BSD (in increasing order of "coolness" in the glitzy, unnecessary dancing rodents sense) without having to actually express any personal preferences during setup. -- Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ] I was essentially an anarcho-capitalist in high school, rather than wasting the folly of my youth on something lame like revolutionary communism.
Description: PGP signature