I love Fluxbox too for its lightweightness and configurability. If you find it too minimalistic, I think that XFCE can be a good compromise also since it runs quite fast compared to KDE and Gnome while having most of their functionalities. XFCE is also compatible with Compiz...
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:39 PM, C. P. Ghost <cpgh...@cordula.ws> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Jorge Biquez <jbiq...@intranet.com.mx> > wrote: > > I was wondering if you can tell suggest me based on yoru experience on > what > > path to follow? KDE? any other? > > Using fluxbox here for ages (used olvwm, ctwm, and fvwm[2] before. It's low > overhead, very low cpu/disk/memory footprint, very fast and reasonabley > easy > to configure and customize. > > IMHO, KDE & Gnome are too heavyweight, but that's really a matter of taste > (and adequate hardware). > > > Jorge Biquez > > Regards, > -cpghost. > > -- > Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
